background image background image background image
background image
florida state courts

  • Strategic Planning Main Page
  • Planning Initiatives
  • Planning Publications
  • Other Documents


  • Judicial Branch Governance Study Group
  • Committee on Access to Court Records
  • Judicial Management Council
  • Task Force on Judicial Branch Planning



  • strategic planning banner

    Committee on Access to Court Records

    Issued Reports

    Authority:

    AOSC06-27 The Committee on Privacy and Court Records was established in 2003 and charged with providing recommendations regarding the electronic release of court records in Florida. In August 2005, the committee submitted its report.

    Members through July 1, 2008:

    The Honorable Judith L. Kreeger (Chair)
    Ms. Sharon Abrams
    Ms. Kristin Adamson
    Ms. Robin Berghorn
    The Honorable David Ellsperman
    The Honorable Mel Grossman
    Mr. Jonathon Kaney, Jr.
    The Honorable Melanie May
    Mr. Timothy McLendon
    Mr. Paul Regensdorf
    Mr. Murray B. Silverstein
    The Honorable Kim A. Skievaski
    The Honorable Elijah Smiley
    Mr. Walt Smith
    The Honorable Charles Williams

    The primary purpose of the Committee is to review Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.240 and develop proposed revisions to the rule with regard to the following:

    1. Recommendation Two: Scope of Confidentiality
      Review and explore revision of rule 2.240 to narrow its application to a finite set of exemptions that are appropriate in the court context and are identifiable.

    2. Recommendation Eight: Unauthorized Filings
      Study court rules to prohibit the filing of documents that are not authorized by court rule or statute, or seeking relief from the court.

    3. Recommendation Twelve: Conditions for Electronic Access
      Propose amendments to rule 2.240 to allow remote access to court records in electronic form to the general public in jurisdictions where conditions are met.

    4. Recommendation Thirteen: Confidential Information
      Propose revisions to rule 2.240 to clarify that those records defined in the rule are confidential and may not be released as provided. This requirement is already established in existing law, therefore, the committee is to propose a rule amendment or committee note that is consistent with the current law.

    5. Recommendation Sixteen: Unsealing of Records
      The Committee will propose revisions to rule 2.240 that will provide a clear and effective mechanism through which a preliminary determination that a record is exempt or confidential can be challenged or reviewed.

    6. Recommendation Seventeen: Responsibility of Filer
      The Committee will propose revisions to rule 2.240 to provide for certain responsibilities of the filer of court documents regarding confidential information.